TAMRAH NEWS

Gunmen opened fire during a funeral at a Greek Orthodox church in the village of Hamoud in Jordan’s Karak Governorate, killing seven people and wounding more than thirty others.

Footage broadcast on Jordanian state television showed armed individuals approaching the church and opening fire. The attack targeted mourners gathered for the funeral procession. Both the gunmen fled the scene according to initial reports.

Jordan’s Public Security Directorate and state media confirmed the casualty figures. The kingdom declared three days of national mourning. King Abdullah stated that the terrorist attack against Karak would be met with the harshest retaliation.

The interior minister described the perpetrators as a group of extremists. The attack stood out in a country that has generally experienced lower levels of such violence compared with some neighbors. The targeting of a Christian community gathering during a funeral added to the gravity of the incident.

Security forces launched an immediate manhunt. The remote character of parts of Karak Governorate presented challenges for rapid containment. Officials emphasized that the response would be firm and comprehensive.

The Greek Orthodox community and other Christian groups in Jordan expressed shock and grief. Religious leaders called for unity and calm while demanding justice. The government moved to reassure minority communities of their protection.

International reactions included condemnations from regional and Western governments. The attack was viewed as an assault on both national security and intercommunal coexistence in Jordan.

Medical facilities in the area treated the wounded, some of whom were in serious condition. The precise number of injuries varied slightly across early reports but remained in the range of thirty to forty.

Jordanian authorities maintained heightened security measures in the governorate and at other potential soft targets. The investigation focused on identifying the gunmen, any supporting network, and the ideological motivation behind the assault.

The declaration of national mourning reflected the seriousness with which the leadership viewed the attack. Public statements from the palace and government underscored determination to prevent any recurrence and to hold those responsible fully accountable.

A Paris suburb shooting unfolded across Trappes and La Verrière when a gunman opened fire from a vehicle, killing one person and wounding five others in a drive-by shooting Paris.

The Trappes gun attack and subsequent La Verrière shooting lasted approximately fifteen minutes. Among the wounded was a 12-year-old girl shot eight times who remained in stable condition. Interior Minister Nuñez described the incident as clearly a terrorist crime and characterized it as a racist attack France, likely Islamophobic in nature.

The anti-terror prosecutor France opened a terrorist crime investigation for murder in connection with a terrorist enterprise. Investigators are examining whether the acts targeted victims on the basis of real or perceived race, ethnicity, nationality, or religion. At least two of the immigrant victims France were of African or North African origin according to local officials.

The Coignières suspect, a 39-year-old man, was arrested nearby. Police recovered a submachine gun and tear-gas grenades during the submachine gun arrest. The rapid detention prevented further casualties in the Paris suburb shooting.

Mayors of the affected towns stated that the gunman appeared to be firing at random with the intention of causing maximum harm. The combination of a mobile attacker and multiple scenes required coordinated police and medical response across Trappes and La Verrière.

The terrorist crime investigation remains under the authority of the anti-terror prosecutor France. Officials have urged caution regarding precise details of the victims while the inquiry proceeds. The Interior Minister Nuñez statements confirmed the seriousness with which authorities are treating the drive-by shooting Paris.

The Paris suburb shooting occurred against a backdrop of heightened security concerns in France. The racist attack France classification and the involvement of the anti-terror prosecutor France have drawn national attention. Further information on the Coignières suspect’s background and any ideological motivation is expected as the investigation advances.

Emergency services treated the wounded, including the 12-year-old girl shot, at area hospitals. The submachine gun arrest and recovery of additional weapons provided key evidence for the terrorist crime investigation. Local communities expressed shock while calling for both justice and calm.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy claimed that two mega tankers hit mines in the Strait of Hormuz after attempting to cross the waterway on routes Tehran considers unauthorized.

According to the IRGC tanker claims reported by Iranian state media, the two supertankers hit mines while carrying approximately 2 million barrels of crude oil each. The IRGC Navy statement said the first tanker struck a naval mine that triggered an explosion and a fierce fire. The second vessel hit a mine that left it immobilized and engulfed in a massive blaze.

The IRGC stated that both vessels had switched off their radar systems and positioning equipment before attempting the transit. Iranian officials described the chosen path as an unauthorized route Hormuz that violated regulations imposed by Tehran since it asserted control over the strait. The IRGC Navy statement framed the incidents as the result of the tankers ignoring warnings and attempting to pass through a prohibited zone.

No vessel names, flags, or ownership details were released in the initial IRGC tanker claims. There has been no independent confirmation mines of the reported strikes from shipping registries, insurers, flag states, or major maritime monitoring organizations. The Joint Maritime Information Center previously assessed similar IRGC claims about two supertankers hit mines and stated there was no substantiation for those reports.

The Strait of Hormuz mines allegations form part of a broader pattern of IRGC statements regarding shipping in the strategic waterway. The strait carries a significant share of global oil trade, and any disruption carries immediate implications for energy markets. The reported tanker fire Hormuz incidents added to existing concerns about navigational safety in the area.

Iranian state media emphasized that the vessels had deactivated their systems and chosen a southern route that Tehran does not authorize. The IRGC Navy statement warned that continued use of unauthorized routes would expose ships and the oil companies involved to greater costs. Subsequent IRGC statements referred to additional tankers being affected in the following days, though independent verification remained absent.

Maritime agencies have maintained advisories highlighting the elevated risk environment in and around the Strait of Hormuz. The combination of claimed naval mines Strait of Hormuz, reported attacks, and restricted transit options has reduced the volume of commercial traffic willing to make the passage. Operators that continue to transit often do so under heightened security protocols and with limited public tracking data.

The absence of independent confirmation mines has led analysts and shipping sources to treat the IRGC tanker claims with caution. While Iranian media broadcast statements and in some cases footage said to show burning vessels, external confirmation of the specific cause—naval mines versus other forms of attack—has not been established in public reporting.

The 2 million barrels crude figure cited for each of the two mega tankers underscores the potential scale of any verified incident. A successful mine strike on fully laden supertankers would represent a significant event for both the vessels involved and the broader energy supply chain. The radar systems switched off detail forms a consistent element across the IRGC accounts of the alleged passages.

Hormuz shipping disruption has already influenced global oil prices and insurance costs for vessels operating in the region. The latest Iran mega tankers mines claims add another layer to the uncertainty surrounding safe transit. Shipping companies, charterers, and insurers continue to monitor official advisories and independent assessments rather than relying solely on unilateral statements.

Further information from Iranian authorities, maritime monitoring centers, or the operators of any affected vessels would be required to clarify the status of the reported incidents. Until such confirmation emerges, the IRGC Navy statement regarding the two supertankers hit mines remains an unverified claim within the ongoing contest over control and access in the Strait of Hormuz.

The strategic importance of the waterway ensures that any credible report of naval mines Strait of Hormuz or successful attacks on large crude carriers will continue to draw close attention from energy markets, naval forces, and commercial shipping interests. The current set of IRGC tanker claims fits into that larger pattern of competing narratives about security and authority in one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints.

Ursula von der Leyen left the European Parliament chamber while Slovak MEP Milan Uhrik was delivering a sharp attack on her leadership and on planned additional funding for Ukraine.

The European Commission president was present for the session reviewing the recent EU summit. As Milan Uhrik began speaking, von der Leyen rose and headed for the exit with members of her staff. Uhrik noticed her departure and raised his voice, calling across the chamber: “Don’t run, don’t run! You should be ashamed that, together with Zelensky, you are trying to cheat Europeans out of another 70 billion euros.”

In his Milan Uhrik speech, the Slovak MEP accused von der Leyen of taking tens of billions of euros from working European citizens who are already becoming poorer in order to finance a war that, in his words, has no military solution. He linked the planned 70 billion euros Ukraine package to the rising cost of living across the continent and to what he described as endless inflation and economic pressure on ordinary families.

Uhrik told the chamber that the timing of the new funding request was especially damaging. He pointed to protests across European cities and to the struggles of young people seeking housing, families dealing with higher prices, and companies facing energy costs. He asked why those domestic needs were not being prioritized instead of further transfers to Ukraine.

The exchange occurred during debate on the outcomes of the mid-October European Council summit. At that summit, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had requested additional support, and von der Leyen had publicly confirmed a financing gap of approximately 70 billion euros for 2027. The EU had already approved a 90 billion euro loan package covering parts of 2026 and 2027, but the Commission president stated that a further shortfall remained.

Video of the moment spread rapidly. In the footage, von der Leyen can be seen leaving the floor as Uhrik continues speaking and directs his remarks toward her departing figure. The Slovak MEP’s “don’t run von der Leyen” line became the most shared element of the clip. Supporters of Uhrik described the walkout as an inability to face criticism. Others noted that Commission presidents sometimes leave the chamber for scheduled commitments, though the timing and Uhrik’s direct address made the moment politically charged.

Milan Uhrik, leader of the Republic movement in Slovakia and a member of the European Parliament, has been a consistent critic of current EU policies on Ukraine, migration, and the Green Deal. In this intervention he framed the additional Ukraine funding as a transfer of resources away from European taxpayers at a time of domestic economic strain. He ended by telling von der Leyen that if the Commission could not or would not address the needs of European citizens first, it should step aside.

The incident added to ongoing tensions inside the European Parliament over the scale and duration of financial support for Ukraine. Several member states have expressed reservations about open-ended commitments, while the Commission and a majority of governments have maintained that continued assistance remains necessary. The 70 billion euros figure for 2027 has become a focal point of that debate.

No immediate official comment was issued by the European Commission on the walkout itself. The session continued after von der Leyen’s departure. The video of the Milan Uhrik speech and the moment she left the chamber continued to circulate widely, keeping the exchange in public view in the days that followed.

The confrontation underscored the growing divide within EU institutions between those who view sustained large-scale support for Ukraine as a strategic necessity and those who argue that European citizens are being asked to carry an unsustainable financial burden. Uhrik’s direct challenge and von der Leyen’s exit from the floor turned a routine parliamentary debate into one of the more memorable political moments of the current term.